About Me

Name:The Mojave Hermit
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Ultimate In Stupidity

The Ultimate in Stupidity


James Fox

  In a desperate attempt to divert attention away from his malfeasance in office, or actually distracted to the extent that he totally disregarded the consequences of his actions, George Bush put the lives of thousands of American citizens in jeopardy. Knowing full well that in this global economy, hundreds of multi-national corporations employ thousands of American citizens, and that those citizens must live and work in the middle-east, he chose to launch a frontal attack on a well organized terrorist group.

 This group is known to have private financing and the governmental and public support of many Arab states. This means they'll be as hard to catch and punish as catching a goldfish with boxing gloves on your hands. Missile and bombing attacks are like dumping a tank full of guppies on the floor to get one goldfish out. It's just plain stupid.

 The terrorists had already stated that they were at war with America, and they considered the military and civilians were both enemies because they were American. Now we have given the middle-eastern nations reason to aid them in their missions of revenge against the hated American living and working in their country. I shudder to think what will happen over the next few years because they never forget. The war of the Crusades lasted 200 years and the Christians never did prevail.
 

I'm not saying those terrorists shouldn't have been punished, but Bush really goofed in the way he did the deed. The task should have been taken on by private money, and the terrorists should have not been "killed." All that came to the training camps or any gathering places should have started to die from some new unknown cause. When they figured out that only members of the terrorist groups were dying, they would get the message, but would not be able to place blame.
 

In closing, I'd like to leave you with this thought: How many sleepers do we have among us? A sleeper is an immigrant or a person who has lived, gone to school , or worked abroad, or a teacher on a work visa. Sleepers are ideal citizens until they are called upon to fulfill their assignments. Some might attack the power supply, the water supply, or communications -- while others just go around blowing up key buildings. I'm Sorry, George Bush, may God forgive you because history surely won't.
 

James Fox, The Mojave Hermit
hermit1@qnet.com

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On The Law

On The Law

 

For several years I have read and listened to the debate, carried on by supposedly intelligent people, over whether or not capital punishment was an effective deterrent. From the bleeding-heart liberal Judges to the modern day T.V. News anchors, many have stoutly proclaimed that it was not effective.

            They and all who espouse this theory are wrong. I propose to prove that they are wrong, and they are going to help me do it. First, some examples of the deterrent measures taken by and readily accepted by society:

            1. The family collie, for no apparent reason kills and eats half of a young child. What happens? The dog is put to sleep. Why? The reason given is to deter him from killing again. After a tame, domesticated animal kills, history proves that it will continue until it is killed. Naturally, this is no object lesson for other dogs, but it does deter that dog.

            2. A woman jogger is killed in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains by a mountain lion. A mother lion protecting her new-born cub. What happens? A search party organizes, then she is tracked down and killed. Why? Is it a deterrent to other lions? No, it is to keep her from killing again. Humans are very protective of their own.

            3. Two young brothers unable to wait for their parents to age and die naturally, shoot them twelve times from behind at pointblank range and claim self defense. What happens? A sick society tries desperately to find some justification for their actions. Why? Because their logic is all screwed up.

            4. History proves that criminals who have killed will kill again, rapists will rape again, and molesters will molest until the day they die. The only action that will act as a deterrent on those future horrible acts is for them to die now. To say that killing a murderer will not deter the next murderer is a tactic in misdirection. At least, the one who is executed is deterred and interred.

In our current sick society, many judges are objecting to California's "three strikes" law, saying they have lost their flexibility to adjudicate cases individually. Under the law, the judges have no ability to tailor the sentence to make it appropriate to the defendant and to the crime.

            For some politically correct reason, the media can't even call a criminal, a criminal; they invariably call him the defendant, even when and after he is sentenced.

These Bleeding-heart, liberal judges don't seem to realize that they are the root cause of our needing such a law. The ugly gray world they exist in, is killing us. People, who live their lives in the black and white world of being robbed, raped, or shot; only know at the end of the day, yes we did or no we didn't, get robbed, raped or shot.

When we finally get smart enough to punish criminals for breaking the law and punish each criminal equally under that law. Only then will our streets be restored to some semblance of order.

 If we allow the courts to be involved with mitigating circumstances, the criminal's childhood abuse, the fact that he doesn't have a job, or suffered a moment of insane rage, we will be entangled forever in endless litigation in our courts and anarchy in our streets.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ACLU Where Are You

ACLU Where are you?


James Fox

Our forefathers created the 14th Amendment to our Constitution in an attempt to insure every citizen's right to due process and equal protection under the law. In other words, under our Constitution, each and every one of you readers are legally entitled to fair and equal treatment by law enforcement. The ACLU gives lip service to this guarantee, but raises all sort of indignant objections to this, when government take steps to insure this equal treatment.

How many times have you sat fuming in your vehicle as a police officer writes you a speeding ticket, while dozens of cars speed by going as fast or faster than you were before he singled you out to ticket? Under the Constitution, every vehicle speeding by going faster than the speed limit, has to be pulled over and given a ticket, or your 14th Amendment rights have been violated. This same example applies to any other traffic law violation including parking in handicapped spaced, etc.

Now logic dictates that the L.A.P.D. or the Highway Patrol, both of which are way understaffed, under-equipped and operating on a reduced budget; cannot arrest every law-breaker on the streets and highways. However, to comply with the Constitution they must. If they do not, the ACLU should step in to insist that they punish none. This of course would allow total chaos. Everyone could drive anyway they chose with impunity. What a conundrum!

The answer, of course, is cameras. Cameras everywhere … at intersections, on freeway overpasses, in schools, even in churches. Actually with a constantly growing population and an ever-increasing crime rate, our law enforcement capabilities will never be able to cope.

Unfortunately, the ACLU is the loudest opponent to you receiving the fair and equal treatment you are entitled to. They place your personal privacy ahead of your constitutional guarantees. The only other loud opponents to cameras being used to insure that every law-breaker being caught by the cameras and punished equally, are the people who are probably busy breaking the laws on a daily basis. These people are the product of over 40 years of liberal indoctrination and have absolutely no respect for our legal system. They are the ones caught by the Media cameras looting and vandalizing property during our frequent riots. I have yet to hear that our liberal media has turned those photos of local people looting and breaking windows, over to the police, so they could be prosecuted and made to pay for their crimes.

This nation is constructed to be a Nation of Laws, not Men, but somehow we all seem to have chosen to place the individual ahead of the community, and allow the ACLU to use all sorts of ridiculous arguments to subvert the letter of the law.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gasoline Ripoff

One huge Rip off


James Fox

It seems like every time every time something happens in the world that could possibly have an impact on the delivery of gasoline from the oil well to the gas-pump, the petroleum industry giants immediately bump up the price of a gallon of gas.

They don't wait until the eminent cost increase is verified, they just zip out and reset the gas pumps and justify their actions via the news media after enough complaints are received and enough questions are asked about the price increase.

The captive victims, the dependent public never seems to question or try to verify the actual impact on real total margins that quantify and justify the increases in pump prices - prices that currently have jumped 25 cents in less than 7 days.

Real total margins -- the difference between the pump price and the sum of crude costs and taxes -- had declined during the 1980's, were fairly stable in the 1990's, and have fluctuated over the last several years as the gasoline supply situation became more volatile. While this was happening, numerous enhancements in the quality and complexity of gasoline (such as the phasing out of lead as an octane booster and the introduction of oxygenated and reformulated grades) have been introduced.

These margins have profit already factored into them, so a gradual recovery of diminished profits could be stretched out over several months, and these sudden huge increases in pump prices could be eliminated. The following is an example of how the oil companies are attempting to get the consumer to finance increases in costs and in the process double dip to profit from the change:

The average franchise gas station has 10,000 gallon, storage tanks, so we will base this example on a typical gas station on 8/11/03 selling gas at $1.74 per gallon. And on 8/18/03 increasing the price to $1.92. The cost of crude actually dropped 3 cents. Distribution, Marketing and Profit costs dropped 7 cents. State and local taxes increased 1 cent. However, refinery costs and profit increased 25 cents resulting in a total cost increase of 16 cents during this one-week period.

One rip off was the 2 cent increase over the actual cost increase, but the real rip off was this…If during this week, the station pumped 4,000 gallons of gas at $1.74 the remainder in the tank was $1.74 gasoline with all the costs and profits factored in, the next load of $1.92 gas was mixed with the $1.74 gas and the resultant price based on ratio and factored costs, should have been $1.81.

When they raised the price of the whole 10,000 gallons in that tank, they double dipped to the tune of 11 cents times 6000, or $660. That's on just one tank, think about the huge rip off throughout the state. Reclaiming that money from the oil companies would go a long way toward getting California out of debt.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Testing

TESTING
Then-Now-When-Why


James Fox

Education:

Then, If they had a teacher's union when I went to school, it was a well kept secret. I was dragged to several PTA meetings in the early evening (Mom didn't trust me home alone...she had a home bakery going, and I loved to eat). Anyway, at those meetings it was the parents who did most of the talking, and the teachers who answered the questions about what was going on at school.

I was personally tutored when I had trouble learning, I was whipped with a willow switch in the first grade, paddled with a paddle in the sixth when I was bad.

My teachers were dedicated, slave driving taskmasters, who loved me so much they took personal responsibility for my education. They knew their subjects and had no agenda except teaching, and that should be credential enough for any school.

Now colleges are accepting kids who have to take remedial classes before they can do any college class-work because they can't read or write. What on earth happened that could have created this shambles of the education system? Answer:

The National Education Association (N.E.A.) kept a low profile until the early part of 1970 when it started flexing its muscle. The N.E.A. war-chest for lobbying has many politician's hands sweating. In 1975 The California branch of the N.E.A. was born as the California Teachers Association -- then in 1977 the N.E.A. took control of the P.T.A. and opened offices in Washington D.C.

Gray Davis in a stupid attempt to reform education presented AB 1X. "Peer Review" which cannot work in a union atmosphere. Lets face it, if you were a 5th grade teacher and you had test scores to grade and your job depended on the accumulative results of the grades, what would you do? And you, the 6th grade teacher...you've known the 5th grade teacher for 12 years and your kids play with hers. Her class is out of control, 52% are outright failing and the discipline has broken down. You have to write an evaluation of her performance as a teacher. What are you going to do? What will the union let you do?

When I thought there was no hope, the battle was lost, a tiny spark of reason started to glow within the Los Angeles school area. The second largest school district decided that it was time to put the money where it would do the most good. They decided to link salary to achievements.

Officials from the Los Angeles School District are calling for a link between teacher salaries and student achievement in a new contract. The proposal could mean $7,000 more per year in additional income for Los Angeles School District teachers who develop specialized academic skills and work at schools where test scores rise by a specified amount. The union is furious! And I'm so happy, I could just sh..! If this catches on, our children might have a chance after all.

Why am I so happy? I'll tell you why. The children are going to be entering a competitive world when they leave school and their success and perhaps even their survival will hinge on future testing. So, the sooner they are subjected to being tested and graded, the sooner they can be assisted in their weak areas.

When the second world war ended, and thousands of G-Is returned to civilian life, many jobs were occupied by patriotic women who didn't want to return to the kitchen, so when I got to Detroit with a wife and an infant daughter, there wasn't a single rental listing in the Detroit Times. We camped "out" while I stood in a line, that stretched for three blocks, to register for unemployment and work. There were no jobs listed in the paper either -- NONE!

I spent so much time at the unemployment office, I made friends with one of the councilors. He was such a nice guy he let me come over to his house and wash his car and do all sorts of things for him, in return one night, about midnight, he called me and gave me instructions on how to get to a company that was going to be hiring in the morning.

I cleaned up, jumped on the streetcar and when I got there, I was 47th in line for the job. At 7:00 a.m. sharp they herded us into a large room and announced that we would be taking two days of written examinations and on the final day, the survivors would be interviewed. The tests covered every field imaginable the math included doing square-root by hand, writing analytical geometric equations, and they even had some elementary physics equations.

I got the job. And that life-lesson remains deeply etched in my memory forever.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Indoctrination

Recently I had a conversation with a young friend–not a callow youth but a father of two–who, while running his own business, was taking a course in psychology for credit toward his degree.

He was both frustrated and discouraged by the reality that his teacher constantly was straying from the course parameters by coloring and injecting her own bias and beliefs into course definitions and conclusions.

Our conversation turned to questioning whether teachers should be allowed to interject their own opinions or beliefs into courses such as psychology, political science, history or literature?

Actually this practice is anti-everything our democracy stands for, and amounts to indoctrination or brainwashing. I believe they should be punished for the practice. Here is why, by example:

On Foxnews.com Wednesday, May 9,
America's Re-Education Camps,
by Wendy McElroy

This fall, tens of thousands of bright-eyed and malleable young men and women will descend on American campuses to begin their academic careers in earnest. Most of them will face what we used to call freshman orientation. More than anything, though, it's looking more and more like indoctrination.

One of the main components of many of these orientations is diversity, or sensitivity training. Attendance is usually mandatory and often tax-funded. Students will watch films and participate in exercises designed to shake the values they acquired from their culture and families. Two of the most popular diversity-training films are Blue Eyed and Skin Deep.

The 90-minute Blue Eyed documents an experiment conducted by Jane Elliott, a $6,000-a-day sensitivity trainer. In it, a group of 40 people are divided into blue-eyed and brown-eyed people. The former are psychologically brutalized; the latter are psychologically empowered as a lesson in white racism.

Hugh Vasquez's Skin Deep documents a workshop on race. One section of the accompanying study guide–entitled White Privilege–declares that white privilege controls all power in society and that whites must assume their guilt.

Requiring sensitivity training attendance has caused some critics to make comparisons to Soviet psychiatry and the reeducation camps of some Communist countries, such as Maoist China. There, reeducation attempted to replace "bad" personal attitudes with ones that served the purpose of the state.

In an article entitled "Thought Reform 101" (Reason, March 2000) Alan Charles Kors, the cofounder of The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, explicitly compares this diversity training to Communist reeducation camps. It is a comparison worth pursuing.

This indoctrination process has evolved into an organized effort on the university level, and backed by the state to control how and what we think; and it is prevalent to a minor degree in our K-12 environment; maybe not organized, but consciously or unconsciously introduced by every teacher that voices a view or opinion about curriculum content or current events.

So you see, It's not just the individual teacher using bad judgment in the course of doing his or her job, It is an organized effort in social engineering at work in our educational systems. It's no wonder they have little or no time for the 3 "Rs."

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »